【Roman Huber】

SAVE $400:As of April 22,Roman Huber the roborock Q5 Pro+ Robot Vacuum and Mop is on sale at Amazon for $299.99. That's 57% off its list price of $699.99.

---

Opens in a new window Credit: roborock roborock Q5 Pro+ Robot Vacuum and Mop $299.99 at Amazon
$699.99 Save $400

There have been some great robot vacuum deals popping up lately, which is nice if you've been looking for a little extra help to get some cleaning done around the house right now. At the moment, one of our favorite deals is on the roborock Q5 Pro+ robot vacuum and mop, which is currently marked down by over 50% at Amazon.

More specifically, the roborock Q5 Pro+ Robot Vacuum and Mop has received a 57% discount that's dropped its price from $699.99 to $299.99. That's a great discount to take advantage of on such a versatile robot vacuum. It's worth keeping in mind that it's listed as a limited-time deal as well, so it may not stick around at this price for very long. If it has caught your eye, now is the time to pick it up.

Mashable Trend Report Decode what’s viral, what’s next, and what it all means. Sign up for Mashable’s weekly Trend Report newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

SEE ALSO: I've tested 20+ robot vacuums and these are the best for every budget in 2025

From hard floors to carpets to tile, the roborock Q5 Pro+ will keep a variety of surfaces neat and tidy as it zooms around. It features a 5500Pa suction and dual rubber brushes that'll take care of any dirt or hair that's hiding away on your floors, and the mop will give harder surfaces a nice shine. It's also self-emptying, so you can keep it going for up to seven weeks before needing to empty the dust bag.

Don't miss out on 57% off the roborock Q5 Pro+ robot vacuum and mop at Amazon.

This isn't the only cleaning device deal that's caught our eye. At the moment you can also save on the Dyson V11 Origin if you're just looking for a regular vacuum to have around the house.

Topics Robot Vacuums

• Deals
• Shopping
• Entertainment
• Games
• Science
• Tech
• Social Good
• Life

• Get Rid of Windows 10 Ads, Office Offers and Other Annoyances
• Fidel Speaks: Literature in Castro’s Cuba
• From Gods to Guns: How Our Stories of War Have Changed
• Habitat for Humility: Voluntourism in Lesotho
• The Sound and the “Furious”
• How Mary Toft Convinced the World She’d Birthed Rabbits
• #ReadEverywhere, Even in the Ring
• Ralph Ellison and Gordon Parks’s Forgotten Photo Essay
• Reality Distortion Field: 10 Things Apple Won't Directly Say But We'll Infer About the iPhone X
• Michael Herr, 1940

• Hans Op de Beeck, Night Time
• The Norwegian
• Steve DiBenedetto’s Cave Paintings for the Future
• Inane Puppies: Charlotte Brontë on Men and Marriage
• When Children Meet Eugene Ionesco
• The Secret History of “Eeny Meeny Miny Mo”
• Trollope’s “Doctor Thorne” Adapted By “Downton” Creator
• When Eudora Welty Went Sailing with Faulkner
• Botero’s “Adam,” the Sculpture New Yorkers Love to Touch
• When Did Table Settings Become So Lavish?

• Every MCU movie villain ranked, from "Iron Man" to "Thunderbolts*"
• The NBA Finals Get Interesting
• Staff Picks: John Aubrey, Leopoldine Core, Jennifer Grotz
• Can Poets Save the Parks? Well … Maybe.
• Keeping Hope Alive
• What If Algorithms Made Cities? Daniel Brown’s Dystopian Photos
• Heartbroken? The Museum of Broken Relationships Is Here for You
• Thirty Malapropisms
• 4GHz CPU Battle: AMD 2nd
• How We Imagined a Female President Would Look in 1992

• NYT Connections Sports Edition hints and answers for April 17: Tips to solve Connections #206
• What Does an Italo Calvino Look Like as a Building?
• Falling for Fitzgerald
• Translating Adonis’s “Elegy for the Times”
• Best Max streaming deal: Save 20% on annual subscriptions
• Heartbroken? The Museum of Broken Relationships Is Here for You
• All In: Oklahoma
• What Does an Annie Ernaux Novel Look Like as a Building?
• Best iPad deal: Save $132 on Apple iPad (10th Gen)
• How We Imagined a Female President Would Look in 1992