RIP,local women who enjoy auto eroticism Groot, we hardly knew you were dead.
SEE ALSO: How 'Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2' raises the stakes of the Marvel Cinematic UniverseDirector James Gunn broke a million hearts today when he confirmed that, yes, Groot dies at the end of the first Guardians of the Galaxy. Baby Groot is his son, not his resurrected form.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Predictably, the internet went wild with grief. And yes, I'm including myself here.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
But ... this isn't exactly news.
As Gunn goes on to note, this is far from the first time he's confirmed that, yes, Groot is dead. Indeed, he's been having different versions of this conversation basically since the first Guardianscame out.
Back in the day, he used to be cagier about the answer. In November 2014, a few months after Guardianshit theaters, he answered a question about whether or not Groot was invincible with another question: "Is Baby Groot, Groot? Or is Baby Groot actully Groot's progeny?"
A few months later, he said Groot "might be dead." A few months after that, when a fan asked on Facebook whether Baby Groot was Groot's son, Gunn replied that it was "complicated," and added that Baby Groot does not retain the original Groot's memories.
(Worth noting: Apparently, even Marvel Studios president Kevin Feige's been confused by this question – he told press in 2016 that Baby Groot has Groot's memories, which is incorrect.)
By last year, though, Gunn was being very clear about his answer. "Baby Groot is not Groot," he stressed in a March 2017 interview with SFX(via GamesRadar). "He’s a different character and he does not have that character’s memories."
When the issue came up yet again last fall, Gunn said in no uncertain terms that "Groot is dead," explaining:
Although I don't necessarily think it's obvious in Vol. 1, it's important to say that if you exploded and a little glob of you started growing into a baby, I would not assume that baby was you.
I do think it's more obvious in Vol. 2, as Baby Groot has a different personality than Groot, none of his memories, and is much, much dumber.
Still, some fans aren't buying it – leaving Gunn to debate them on social media.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
One even brought real science into this science-fiction conversation:
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Anyway, Gunn's answer actually just raises more questions, if you think about it. Such as:
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
And:
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
And:
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Now we're veering toward Black Mirrorterritory. Because, like ... is it? Does Baby Groot reallycount as a separate entity if he's literally just a growing piece of the original Groot? Would they still be considered different Groots if both of them were still alive? I don't know, is Digital Nanette the same person as Real World Nanette in "U.S.S. Callister"? Is a consciousness what makes a person?
Is it possible to get a new Groot without killing the old one, or is that seriously the only way to bring new Groots into the world? Does that mean all the other Groot splinters left over from the original could have been sentient beings, too? What does it even mean to be sentient in a reality where Ultrons and Visions exist? Why am I getting so worked up over the personhood of a CG tree alien?
And then there's this cold hard fact:
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Maybe that'sthe real reason all of us keep forgetting Groot has really died: It's just too dang sad to remember the truth.
Topics Comics
Best podcasts for when you're on vacation, traveling, or taking a road tripBarack Obama and Prince Harry want activists to get off their hashtags and into the real worldJennifer Lawrence got Kris Jenner the perfect Christmas presentYou can now be a cat in Google Meet callsHow to play podcasts on your Amazon AlexaApple to (finally) launch a redesigned iPad mini this fallFeast your eyes on the 1st photo of Elon Musk's Tesla bound for spaceYou can now be a cat in Google Meet callsUber messes up Facebook ad by confusing Puerto Rican and Cuban flagsRemembering Richard Donner, Superman's realChristmas lights'The Mysterious Benedict Society' is a charming adaptation of a childhood favoriteRoger Federer has a blast hanging out with super cute quokkasMan moves furniture so his wife can make snow angels for 29 Instagram followers'Nice Shirt! Thanks' made me a nice shirt. Thanks!How to delete books from KindleHow to make Alexa swearBest podcasts for when you're on vacation, traveling, or taking a road tripRemembering Richard Donner, Superman's realJimmy Choo pulls Cara Delevingne ad after online backlash Six Tips on Writing Inspired by My Farmers Market by Ann Beattie Tina Barney’s Embarrassment of Riches by Joseph Akel Chekhov On: Two in One Travel Snapshots from an Odyssey Finding Home After the Vietnam War by Zachary Watterson Staff Picks: Eve Ewing, Giudo Morselli, Hernan Diaz Suzanne Ciani and the Subliminal Property of Being Human Little Red and Big Bad, Part 5 What Insanity Is This, Dr. Euclides? Notes from India, 1962 Plainness in Diversity 4' 33": On Listening to the Silence The Day After ‘Neil the Horse’ Rides Again Merce Cunningham’s Legacy Plan Survival Story: An Interview with David France by Garth Greenwell Annabelle: A Ghost Story by Sadie Stein Staff Picks: Pranks, Prints, and Penises Reading J. A. Baker’s ‘The Peregrine’ in Fall Postsurgical Reading: Advice from ‘The Paris Review’
3.4167s , 10193.859375 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【local women who enjoy auto eroticism】,Fresh Information Network