【Sister Emanuelle】

Tesla and Sister Emanuellethe independent product review publication Consumer Reportshave had a hot-and-cold relationship for many years.

The buyer's guide has been smitten and quick to praise the electric car maker at times. But on Monday, Consumer Reportssaid it couldn't recommend the new Model 3 sedan after finally testing the electric vehicle.

The report said "we found plenty to like" about the affordable Model 3 that starts at $35,000, but ultimately, "our testers also found flaws—big flaws—such as long stopping distances in our emergency braking test and difficult-to-use controls."

The Model 3's dependence on the touchscreen dashboard to control mirrors, climate, and most other features lost the car points in the final review. With few physical buttons and controls, Consumer Reportsdecided the touchscreen can actually "cause driver distraction because each act forces drivers to take their eyes off the road and a hand off the steering wheel."

In terms of performance, a braking test also fell short of Consumer Reports' rigorous standards at their test facility with inconsistent results and long stopping distances of 152 feet, about 20 feet longer than the average for this type of vehicle.

Also working against the newest Tesla was "the Model 3’s stiff ride, unsupportive rear seat, and excessive wind noise at highway speeds."

Because of these issues, the newest model wasn't recommended, which was expected in the fall when the company was struggling to produce enough of the cars. Tesla fell behind schedule, but with CEO Elon Musk stepping up in recent months the company is on track to reach its target of 2,500 vehicles made each week.

Tesla responded to Consumer Reports' critique about the stopping distance, explaining its own testing found shorter average braking distances of 133 feet. A Tesla spokesperson said over-the-air software updates can address "corner cases" and "continually does so to improve factors such as stopping distance.”

Musk added to Tesla's response on Twitter, saying, "Tesla won't stop until Model 3 has better braking than any remotely comparable car."

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, or IIHS, last week gave the electric vehicle a "Superior" score on front crash prevention. Other ratings were not yet submitted, except for the headlights category, for which the Model 3 received an "Acceptable" grade.

In 2015, Consumer Reportswent from a glowing review to pulling its recommendation of Tesla's luxury sedan, the Model S, over issues with reliability. It's since back in the ratings guides' good graces. Tesla is more than likely trying to do the same after its latest less-than-stellar review.

UPDATE: May 22, 2018, 2:30 p.m. AEST Tesla CEO Elon Musk responded to Consumer Reportson Twitter. This story has been updated with his tweets.

UPDATE: May 22, 2018, 11:43 a.m. PDT Consumer Reportsresponded Tuesday to Musk's late tweets about updates to improve the vehicle's braking and other issues.

In an email statement the publication wrote it would be willing re-test the Model 3.

"CR is pleased that Tesla is taking our braking test results seriously. That they are committed to implementing a fix and improving stopping distances on the Model 3 is good for everyone on the road. Our goal as a non-profit membership organization is to create a fairer, safer world with and for consumers. That means better and safer products for all. If Tesla can update the brakes over the air--an industry first-- we’d be happy to retest our Model 3," said Jake Fisher, Consumer Reports’ director of automotive testing.