A businessman has won the first 'right to9 Sectret Pesonal Study (Rated 19 Secret Lesson)forgotten' lawsuit against Google in the UK high court, according to the BBC.
The right to be forgotten (RTBF) is an online privacy statute that the European Court of Justice passed in 2014. It states that European citizens can petition search engine companies like Google to delist URLs from search results if the websites contain information that is inaccurate, irrelevant, and not in the public interest to keep available.
SEE ALSO: Europeans asked Google for their 'Right to be Forgotten' 2.4 million timesOf course, determining what is "irrelevant" for an individual versus what is in the public interest to keep accessible is the challenge of enforcing the right to be forgotten. The petitions of two businessmen*, on whose lawsuits the UK court both ruled on Friday, exemplify the balancing act making RTBF decisions requires.
“We work hard to comply with the Right to be Forgotten, but we take great care not to remove search results that are in the public interest and will defend the public’s right to access lawful information," a Google spokesperson told Mashable via email. "We are pleased that the Court recognised our efforts in this area, and we will respect the judgements they have made in this case.”
The businessman who won his suit against Google was reportedly convicted 10 years ago for "conspiring to intercept communications." He served six months in jail. He had petitioned Google to remove news reports and other information about the crime, which Google initially rejected.
A second businessman had petitioned Google to remove search results about a crime for which he served four years in jail. The crime was "conspiring to account falsely," which essentially means monetary or informational fraud for financial gain. The same judge who ruled in favor of the first businessman sided with Google's judgement on this one, and search results that feature the businessman's crime will remain listed.
The Guardianreports that the Judge accepted the former petition because the crime was less serious, and because the individual had reformed and shown remorse. The judge said that the latter claimant, who lost to Google, had continued to deceive the public, so it was in the public's best interest to keep information about his past misdeeds available. Public interest
In a February 2018 transparency report, Google said that from 2014-2017, it received delisting requests under the RTBF for over 2.4 million URLs. It accepted 43 percent of those requests.
It's important to remember that Google doesn't have any skin in the game in the criminal cases of these individuals. What Google is really defending is its decision making process.
Court hearings like these are about further defining that blurry line between individual privacy and public interest in RTBF petitions. This judge's ruling shows that citizens may have recourse beyond Google's decision making about their personal right to be forgotten.
*Both businessmen remain anonymous because of, lol, privacy.
Topics Cybersecurity Google Privacy
Previous:Julian Assange and the Banality of Access
Next:Queer Poserdom
'Mutant Powers' follows a magician giving ordinary people superhuman abilitiesTesla's Autopilot keeps crashing into parked cars. Here's why.Netflix burns 'Roseanne', recommends 'One Day at a Time' insteadThis is just LinYou can bid on a World War I hero's centuryApple launches macOS Mojave with Dark Mode, support for some iOS appsThe 14 best ice cubes, rankedApple spotlights developers making a difference ahead of WWDCTeens are breaking up with Facebook faster than we thought, says studyHari Kondabolu's 'Warn Your Relatives' is a detox from hate speech'Solo' angling toward historic lows for Star Wars after two weeksKayak Trip Huddle eases the frustration of planning for group tripsApple announces new iOS features to combat device addictionThe difference between Guatemala's Fuego volcano and Hawaii's Kilauea'Solo' angling toward historic lows for Star Wars after two weeksDrake responds to blackface criticism in lengthy Instagram postThis daughter's optical illusion went so viral even her mom recreated itElectric cars get a big charge with states, car makers investing moreUber will resume its selfApple's next Animoji innovation is Memoji Google can now predict flight delays New meme tells you what kids these days are REALLY texting about See the super blue blood moon from anywhere on Earth thanks to NASA 'Fantastic Beasts' director: Dumbledore 'not explicitly' gay in sequel Jeff Bezos, Cardi B, Gordon Ramsay star in Amazon's new Super Bowl ad White House throws water on plans for national 5G wireless network Twitter thread proves this British kids' cartoon is the most traumatising show ever Facebook bans cryptocurrency ads due to frequent fraud Celebrities were actually given 'consolation puppies' at the Grammys Someone is already trying to stop sales of Elon Musk's flamethrower Little girl found the creepiest sock and shoe combination imaginable Uber now lets you rent bikes in this hilly city 'Black Panther' was so exciting Donald Glover actually tweeted about it Peter Dinklage talks 'Game of Thrones,' Super Bowl ad Facebook promoted conspiracy theories following Amtrak crash Facebook's 'privacy principles' leave a lot of questions unanswered Cryptocurrency trader held at gunpoint in UK's first Bitcoin heist Man writes heartfelt breakup letter to his gym to end his membership 'Black Panther' currently winning most advance ticket sales for superhero movie Michelle Obama explains her painfully awkward reaction to Melania Trump's gift
2.4324s , 8221.6484375 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【19 Sectret Pesonal Study (Rated 19 Secret Lesson)】,Fresh Information Network